Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) edges ahead of Blackthorn Vision (3.7/5) overall. Berezha Security Group is the better choice for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. Blackthorn Vision is the stronger option for mid-size product companies wanting close senior-engineer access. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Berezha Security Group | Blackthorn Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| HQ | Kyiv, Ukraine | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) | 100–200 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on | Boutique scale with over 15 years of continuous Lviv-based delivery |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope security engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools | React, Node.js, .NET |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector | Enterprise software, Retail |
Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision: overview
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Blackthorn Vision
Blackthorn Vision has run as a boutique custom software firm out of Lviv since 2009, working mainly with mid-size product companies rather than large enterprise accounts. Its scale gives buyers closer access to senior engineers and founders than a large firm would, at the cost of the very large, multi-team delivery capacity that firms like SoftServe or GlobalLogic can offer. Public case studies lean toward general web and mobile product work rather than a single named vertical.
Services and capabilities: Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision
| Capability | Berezha Security Group | Blackthorn Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision
| Framework / platform | Berezha Security Group | Blackthorn Vision |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | N/A |
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision
| Criterion | Berezha Security Group | Blackthorn Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Consulting | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision
| Dimension | Berezha Security Group | Blackthorn Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector | Enterprise software, Retail |
| Best use cases | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | A mid-size product company wanting close founder or senior-engineer access., A buyer running a single-team engagement rather than an enterprise-scale program. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision: pros and cons
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
| Blackthorn Vision | |
|---|---|
| + | Boutique scale gives closer access to senior engineers than a large firm. |
| + | Over 15 years of continuous Lviv-based operation. |
| - | Team size limits capacity for large, multi-team enterprise programs |
| - | No clearly named industry or technical specialization beyond general product development |
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Who should choose Blackthorn Vision?
A typical fit: a mid-size product company wanting close founder or senior-engineer access.
Boutique scale with over 15 years of continuous Lviv-based delivery. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Enterprise software, Retail.
Decision matrix: Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Berezha Security Group |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Blackthorn Vision |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Berezha Security Group (Not published) vs Blackthorn Vision (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Berezha Security Group |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision
| Use case | Berezha Security Group fit | Blackthorn Vision fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A mid-size product company wanting close founder or senior-engineer access. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer running a single-team engagement rather than an enterprise-scale program. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on.
Blackthorn Vision (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer running a single-team engagement rather than an enterprise-scale program. If your situation matches that, Blackthorn Vision is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Berezha Security Group vs Blackthorn Vision FAQ
Is Berezha Security Group better than Blackthorn Vision?
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. Blackthorn Vision's strongest advantage: boutique scale gives closer access to senior engineers than a large firm.
How do Berezha Security Group and Blackthorn Vision differ in pricing?
Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Blackthorn Vision uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Berezha Security Group or Blackthorn Vision?
Blackthorn Vision is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Berezha Security Group and Blackthorn Vision?
Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Blackthorn Vision's primary differentiator is: boutique scale with over 15 years of continuous Lviv-based delivery. They also differ in team size (50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) vs 100–200 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Enterprise software, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.