Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) edges ahead of Edvantis (3.9/5) overall. Berezha Security Group is the better choice for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. Edvantis is the stronger option for mid-size product companies wanting senior-engineer access over large-team scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Edvantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2014 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | ~338 (as of mid-2026) | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A compact, senior-leaning team rather than large-firm scale | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements | Fixed-scope security engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, React | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools |
| Industries served | Enterprise software, Healthcare, Retail | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group: overview
Edvantis
Edvantis keeps a comparatively compact team by design: roughly 338 people across Europe, North America, and Asia, out of a company founded in Lviv in the mid-2000s. Its smaller headcount relative to the largest firms on this list means less capacity for very large programs, but it also means clients typically get closer access to senior engineers and less account-management overhead. Public information on its exact founding year is less precise than for some peers, so buyers evaluating longevity claims should verify directly with the company.
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Services and capabilities: Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Capability | Edvantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Framework / platform | Edvantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Criterion | Edvantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project | Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Dimension | Edvantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise software, Healthcare, Retail | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
| Best use cases | A mid-size product company wanting close access to senior engineers rather than a large account team., A buyer running a single-team engagement rather than a multi-team enterprise program. | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group: pros and cons
| Edvantis | |
|---|---|
| + | Compact team size gives closer client access to senior engineers than a 2,000+ person firm. |
| + | Multi-continent presence rather than a single office. |
| + | Lviv-founded and still Lviv-headquartered. |
| - | Smaller team caps capacity for very large, multi-team enterprise programs |
| - | Public founding-year detail is less precisely documented than for several peers on this list (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
Who should choose Edvantis?
A typical fit: a mid-size product company wanting close access to senior engineers rather than a large account team.
A compact, senior-leaning team rather than large-firm scale. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Enterprise software, Healthcare, Retail.
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Decision matrix: Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Edvantis |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Edvantis |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Edvantis (Not published) vs Berezha Security Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Edvantis |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Use case | Edvantis fit | Berezha Security Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A mid-size product company wanting close access to senior engineers rather than a large account team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer running a single-team engagement rather than a multi-team enterprise program. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on.
Edvantis (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer running a single-team engagement rather than a multi-team enterprise program. If your situation matches that, Edvantis is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Edvantis vs Berezha Security Group FAQ
Is Edvantis better than Berezha Security Group?
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Edvantis's strongest advantage: compact team size gives closer client access to senior engineers than a 2,000+ person firm. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item.
How do Edvantis and Berezha Security Group differ in pricing?
Edvantis uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Edvantis or Berezha Security Group?
Edvantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Edvantis and Berezha Security Group?
Edvantis's primary differentiator is: a compact, senior-leaning team rather than large-firm scale. Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. They also differ in team size (~338 (as of mid-2026) vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Enterprise software, Healthcare vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.