Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of Qubit Labs (3.7/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for hardware and IoT product companies needing embedded plus cloud under one roof. Qubit Labs is the stronger option for buyers wanting direct control over a staff-augmented Ukraine-based team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2015 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (additional offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 200+ | 50–100 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 360° engineering across embedded, cloud, data & AI, and digital, backed by direct semiconductor partnerships and an in-house hardware lab | A dedicated staff-augmentation and recruiting model rather than owned project delivery |
| Pricing model | Flexible engagement models: tech consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, or full project development, rather than one fixed template | Staff-augmentation, typically billed per placed engineer |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C/C++, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | Varies by placed engineer's stack |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics | Enterprise software, Retail, Fintech |
Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions has operated out of Lviv, Ukraine since 2007 and has grown to more than 200 engineers across offices in Lviv, Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its core strength sits in embedded systems: firmware, RTOS and embedded Linux development, FPGA programming, and electrical engineering, backed by an in-house hardware lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing rigs. That embedded depth is wrapped in a broader Cloud, Data & AI, and Digital practice, so a client building a connected medical device or an industrial IoT platform can get the electronics, firmware, and cloud backend from a single vendor instead of coordinating three separate ones. Clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, and the company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification alongside direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip.
Qubit Labs
Qubit Labs doesn't deliver projects the way most companies on this list do: it's a Kyiv-based staff-augmentation and recruiting specialist, founded in 2015, that builds and places dedicated engineering teams under a client's own management instead of owning delivery itself. That model suits a buyer who wants direct day-to-day control over a Ukraine-based team without running their own local recruiting and HR operation, a meaningfully different value proposition from the fixed-scope or managed-delivery firms elsewhere on this list. It is the wrong fit for a buyer who wants a vendor to own the full project delivery, rather than just staff a team.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | N/A | N/A |
| .NET | N/A | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Team extension, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Staff augmentation, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | Enterprise software, Retail, Fintech |
| Best use cases | A medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and cloud connectivity built together for an IEC 62304-compliant device., An industrial IoT product that needs MCU driver work, secure OTA firmware updates, and an AWS IoT backend from one team. | A buyer that wants to build and manage its own Ukraine-based engineering team directly., A company wanting to avoid setting up its own local Ukrainian recruiting and HR operation. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Staff augmentation |
Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Full-stack engineering from electronics and firmware through cloud and AI, useful for hardware-adjacent products that would otherwise need multiple vendors. |
| + | Direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip rather than working purely from public documentation. |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification, plus healthcare-specific work under IEC 62304 and FDA 21 CFR Part 820 requirements. |
| + | In-house hardware lab shortens the iteration loop on board bring-up and HIL testing instead of shipping hardware out to a third party. |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code transfer to the client on every engagement. |
| - | Not the right fit for a buyer who only needs a plain web or mobile app with no hardware, embedded, or deep-technical component |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house; supports development and ongoing maintenance, but the client still needs a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not obtain regulatory certification on the client's behalf; provides the technical documentation and engineering support, but the client or a third party owns the approval process |
| Qubit Labs | |
|---|---|
| + | Staff-augmentation model gives direct day-to-day control over the team, which some buyers specifically want. |
| + | Handles local recruiting and HR overhead a foreign buyer would otherwise have to build themselves. |
| + | Cost structure typically more accessible than a full managed-delivery engagement. |
| - | Does not own project delivery outcomes, so a buyer needing a vendor to manage the full delivery lifecycle should look elsewhere |
| - | Public data on exact team size is thinner than for more established peers (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and cloud connectivity built together for an IEC 62304-compliant device.
360° engineering across embedded, cloud, data & AI, and digital, backed by direct semiconductor partnerships and an in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics.
Who should choose Qubit Labs?
A typical fit: a buyer that wants to build and manage its own Ukraine-based engineering team directly.
A dedicated staff-augmentation and recruiting model rather than owned project delivery. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Enterprise software, Retail, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Qubit Labs (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Qubit Labs |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Qubit Labs fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and cloud connectivity built together for an IEC 62304-compliant device. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An industrial IoT product that needs MCU driver work, secure OTA firmware updates, and an AWS IoT backend from one team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer that wants to build and manage its own Ukraine-based engineering team directly. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company wanting to avoid setting up its own local Ukrainian recruiting and HR operation. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. 360° engineering across embedded, cloud, data & AI, and digital, backed by direct semiconductor partnerships and an in-house hardware lab.
Qubit Labs (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need a company wanting to avoid setting up its own local Ukrainian recruiting and HR operation. If your situation matches that, Qubit Labs is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Qubit Labs FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Qubit Labs?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: full-stack engineering from electronics and firmware through cloud and AI, useful for hardware-adjacent products that would otherwise need multiple vendors. Qubit Labs's strongest advantage: staff-augmentation model gives direct day-to-day control over the team, which some buyers specifically want.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Qubit Labs differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses flexible engagement models: tech consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, or full project development, rather than one fixed template pricing. Qubit Labs uses staff-augmentation, typically billed per placed engineer pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Qubit Labs?
Qubit Labs is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Qubit Labs?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 360° engineering across embedded, cloud, data & AI, and digital, backed by direct semiconductor partnerships and an in-house hardware lab. Qubit Labs's primary differentiator is: a dedicated staff-augmentation and recruiting model rather than owned project delivery. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 50–100 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs Enterprise software, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.