Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Yalantis (4.1/5) edges ahead of Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) overall. Yalantis is the better choice for healthtech and IoT product companies needing compliance-aware development. Berezha Security Group is the stronger option for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Yalantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2014 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland (Dnipro-founded) | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 201–500 | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements | Fixed-scope security engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | React Native, Node.js, AWS | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group: overview
Yalantis
Yalantis started in Dnipro in 2008 and has since relocated its corporate headquarters to Warsaw, while its public case studies keep circling back to compliant healthcare and IoT product work, run by a team in the 201-500 range. Healthcare compliance work is a visible part of its positioning, alongside logistics and fintech projects, which points to real regulatory experience rather than a checkbox industry list. As with several peers, the Warsaw relocation means a buyer specifically seeking a Ukraine-headquartered vendor should confirm current corporate domicile rather than assume it from the company's Ukrainian origin.
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Services and capabilities: Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Capability | Yalantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Framework / platform | Yalantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | N/A | N/A |
| .NET | N/A | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Criterion | Yalantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project | Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Dimension | Yalantis | Berezha Security Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector |
| Best use cases | A healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development., An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group: pros and cons
| Yalantis | |
|---|---|
| + | Visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies. |
| + | Mid-size team large enough for real product programs but still founder-accessible. |
| + | Warsaw headquarters gives an EU corporate entity for buyers who want that structure. |
| - | Headquarters relocated from Ukraine to Poland, so this is not strictly a Ukraine-domiciled vendor despite its Ukrainian founding |
| - | Team size caps the number of concurrent large programs it can staff compared with the biggest firms on this list |
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
Who should choose Yalantis?
A typical fit: a healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development.
A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech.
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Decision matrix: Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Yalantis |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Yalantis |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Yalantis (Not published) vs Berezha Security Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Yalantis |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group
| Use case | Yalantis fit | Berezha Security Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group
Yalantis (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice.
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. If your situation matches that, Berezha Security Group is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Yalantis vs Berezha Security Group FAQ
Is Yalantis better than Berezha Security Group?
Yalantis (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Yalantis's strongest advantage: visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item.
How do Yalantis and Berezha Security Group differ in pricing?
Yalantis uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Yalantis or Berezha Security Group?
Yalantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Yalantis and Berezha Security Group?
Yalantis's primary differentiator is: a compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice. Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Logistics vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.