Best IT Outsourcing Companies Ukraine

Yalantis vs Cleveroad: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Yalantis (4.1/5) edges ahead of Cleveroad (3.9/5) overall. Yalantis is the better choice for healthtech and IoT product companies needing compliance-aware development. Cleveroad is the stronger option for startups wanting a US or UK commercial contact with Ukraine-based delivery. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Yalantis vs Cleveroad: head-to-head summary

Criterion Yalantis Cleveroad
Founded 2008 2011
HQ Warsaw, Poland (Dnipro-founded) New York, USA / Manchester, UK (Kharkiv delivery center)
Team size 201–500 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)
Rating 4.1 / 5 3.9 / 5
Primary differentiator A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice A multi-office footprint across the US, UK, and Ukraine rather than a single delivery location
Pricing model Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements Fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack React Native, Node.js, AWS React, React Native, Node.js
Industries served Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech Retail, Logistics, Healthcare

Yalantis vs Cleveroad: overview

Yalantis

Yalantis started in Dnipro in 2008 and has since relocated its corporate headquarters to Warsaw, while its public case studies keep circling back to compliant healthcare and IoT product work, run by a team in the 201-500 range. Healthcare compliance work is a visible part of its positioning, alongside logistics and fintech projects, which points to real regulatory experience rather than a checkbox industry list. As with several peers, the Warsaw relocation means a buyer specifically seeking a Ukraine-headquartered vendor should confirm current corporate domicile rather than assume it from the company's Ukrainian origin.

Cleveroad

New York, Los Angeles, Manchester, and Kharkiv are all Cleveroad offices, a spread the company built up since its 2011 founding around general custom software and mobile app development for startups and mid-size businesses. That geographic spread gives buyers a choice of commercial contact point outside Ukraine, at the cost of the narrow technical specialization some of the boutique firms on this list can offer. It competes primarily on general-purpose web and mobile delivery capacity rather than a named industry or technology niche.

Services and capabilities: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Capability Yalantis Cleveroad
Custom software development
Team extension / staff augmentation
Embedded & IoT engineering
Cloud & DevOps
Cybersecurity
Enterprise modernization

Tech stack comparison: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Framework / platform Yalantis Cleveroad
React
AWS N/A
Java N/A N/A
.NET N/A N/A
Python N/A

Pricing comparison: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Criterion Yalantis Cleveroad
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated team, Fixed project Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Dimension Yalantis Cleveroad
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech Retail, Logistics, Healthcare
Best use cases A healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development., An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. A startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based delivery., A mid-market business needing general web or mobile app development.
Typical project type Dedicated team Fixed project

Yalantis vs Cleveroad: pros and cons

Yalantis
+ Visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies.
+ Mid-size team large enough for real product programs but still founder-accessible.
+ Warsaw headquarters gives an EU corporate entity for buyers who want that structure.
- Headquarters relocated from Ukraine to Poland, so this is not strictly a Ukraine-domiciled vendor despite its Ukrainian founding
- Team size caps the number of concurrent large programs it can staff compared with the biggest firms on this list
Cleveroad
+ Multiple commercial offices in the US and UK give buyers a choice of contracting entity.
+ Mid-size team suited to startup and mid-market project scale.
+ Over a decade of continuous operation since 2011.
- General-purpose positioning without a clearly named technical or industry specialization
- Kharkiv is one of several offices rather than the company's sole delivery base

Who should choose Yalantis?

A typical fit: a healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development.

A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech.

Who should choose Cleveroad?

A typical fit: a startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based delivery.

A multi-office footprint across the US, UK, and Ukraine rather than a single delivery location. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Logistics, Healthcare.

Decision matrix: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Yalantis
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Yalantis
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Yalantis (Not published) vs Cleveroad (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Yalantis
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Use case Yalantis fit Cleveroad fit Winner
A healthtech company needing HIPAA or MDR-aware compliant software development. Strong Strong Both equally
An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. Strong Strong Both equally
A startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based delivery. Strong Strong Both equally
A mid-market business needing general web or mobile app development. Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Yalantis (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice.

Cleveroad (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need a mid-market business needing general web or mobile app development. If your situation matches that, Cleveroad is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Yalantis vs Cleveroad FAQ

Is Yalantis better than Cleveroad?

Yalantis (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Yalantis's strongest advantage: visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies. Cleveroad's strongest advantage: multiple commercial offices in the US and UK give buyers a choice of contracting entity.

How do Yalantis and Cleveroad differ in pricing?

Yalantis uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Cleveroad uses fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Yalantis or Cleveroad?

Yalantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Yalantis and Cleveroad?

Yalantis's primary differentiator is: a compliance-focused healthcare and IoT product development practice. Cleveroad's primary differentiator is: a multi-office footprint across the US, UK, and Ukraine rather than a single delivery location. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Logistics vs Retail, Logistics).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.