Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) edges ahead of Qubit Labs (3.7/5) overall. Berezha Security Group is the better choice for companies needing penetration testing or red-team security engagements. Qubit Labs is the stronger option for buyers wanting direct control over a staff-augmented Ukraine-based team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Berezha Security Group | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| HQ | Kyiv, Ukraine | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) | 50–100 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on | A dedicated staff-augmentation and recruiting model rather than owned project delivery |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope security engagements | Staff-augmentation, typically billed per placed engineer |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Penetration testing frameworks, Red-team tooling, Cloud security audit tools | Varies by placed engineer's stack |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector | Enterprise software, Retail, Fintech |
Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs: overview
Berezha Security Group
Three established Ukrainian cybersecurity professionals founded Berezha Security Group in Kyiv in 2014, and unlike nearly every other company on this list, it doesn't build general business software at all: its work is penetration testing, red-team engagements, and security consulting. That narrow focus is exactly what makes it valuable to buyers who specifically need a security audit or offensive-security engagement rather than a development partner, and it is simply the wrong vendor for anyone looking to outsource product development itself.
Qubit Labs
Qubit Labs doesn't deliver projects the way most companies on this list do: it's a Kyiv-based staff-augmentation and recruiting specialist, founded in 2015, that builds and places dedicated engineering teams under a client's own management instead of owning delivery itself. That model suits a buyer who wants direct day-to-day control over a Ukraine-based team without running their own local recruiting and HR operation, a meaningfully different value proposition from the fixed-scope or managed-delivery firms elsewhere on this list. It is the wrong fit for a buyer who wants a vendor to own the full project delivery, rather than just staff a team.
Services and capabilities: Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs
| Capability | Berezha Security Group | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Team extension / staff augmentation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs
| Framework / platform | Berezha Security Group | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | N/A |
| .NET | N/A | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs
| Criterion | Berezha Security Group | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Consulting | Staff augmentation, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs
| Dimension | Berezha Security Group | Qubit Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector | Enterprise software, Retail, Fintech |
| Best use cases | A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit., A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | A buyer that wants to build and manage its own Ukraine-based engineering team directly., A company wanting to avoid setting up its own local Ukrainian recruiting and HR operation. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Staff augmentation |
Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs: pros and cons
| Berezha Security Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. |
| + | Named specialization in penetration testing and red-team engagements. |
| + | Strong Clutch and GoodFirms review base specifically in the security-services category. |
| - | Does not build general business software, so it is the wrong fit for a buyer looking for a development partner rather than a security specialist |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for very large, continuous security-operations programs |
| Qubit Labs | |
|---|---|
| + | Staff-augmentation model gives direct day-to-day control over the team, which some buyers specifically want. |
| + | Handles local recruiting and HR overhead a foreign buyer would otherwise have to build themselves. |
| + | Cost structure typically more accessible than a full managed-delivery engagement. |
| - | Does not own project delivery outcomes, so a buyer needing a vendor to manage the full delivery lifecycle should look elsewhere |
| - | Public data on exact team size is thinner than for more established peers (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
Who should choose Berezha Security Group?
A typical fit: a company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit.
A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Government & public sector.
Who should choose Qubit Labs?
A typical fit: a buyer that wants to build and manage its own Ukraine-based engineering team directly.
A dedicated staff-augmentation and recruiting model rather than owned project delivery. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Enterprise software, Retail, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Berezha Security Group |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Berezha Security Group (Not published) vs Qubit Labs (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Berezha Security Group |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Qubit Labs |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs
| Use case | Berezha Security Group fit | Qubit Labs fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A company needing a penetration test or red-team engagement before a compliance audit. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing an independent security review of an existing codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer that wants to build and manage its own Ukraine-based engineering team directly. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company wanting to avoid setting up its own local Ukrainian recruiting and HR operation. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (Ukraine) projects. A dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on.
Qubit Labs (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need a company wanting to avoid setting up its own local Ukrainian recruiting and HR operation. If your situation matches that, Qubit Labs is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Berezha Security Group vs Qubit Labs FAQ
Is Berezha Security Group better than Qubit Labs?
Berezha Security Group (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Berezha Security Group's strongest advantage: founded specifically by established security professionals rather than a general firm adding security as a line item. Qubit Labs's strongest advantage: staff-augmentation model gives direct day-to-day control over the team, which some buyers specifically want.
How do Berezha Security Group and Qubit Labs differ in pricing?
Berezha Security Group uses fixed-scope security engagements pricing. Qubit Labs uses staff-augmentation, typically billed per placed engineer pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Berezha Security Group or Qubit Labs?
Berezha Security Group is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Berezha Security Group and Qubit Labs?
Berezha Security Group's primary differentiator is: a dedicated cybersecurity specialist founded by established security professionals, distinct from a general developer offering security as an add-on. Qubit Labs's primary differentiator is: a dedicated staff-augmentation and recruiting model rather than owned project delivery. They also differ in team size (50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) vs 50–100 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Enterprise software, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.